Subscribe to RSS Feed
News Newsfeeds Retrospective agreement and consent to neurocritical care is influenced by functional outcome
Written by Critical Care
There are only limited data on consent and satisfaction of patients receiving specialized neurocritical care. In this study we (i) analyzed the extent of retrospective consent to neurocritical care - given by patients or their relatives - depending on functional outcome one year after hospital stay, and (ii) identified predisposing factors for retrospective agreement to neurocritical care.
Methods:
We investigated 704 consecutive patients admitted to a non-surgical neurocritical care unit over a period of two years (2006 to 2007). Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed and the patients were grouped according to their diagnosis. Functional outcome, retrospective consent to neurocritical care and satisfaction with hospital stay was obtained by mailed standardized questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were calculated to determine independent predictors for consent.
Results:
High consent and satisfaction after neurointensive care (91% and 90% respectively) was observed by those patients who reached an independent life one year after neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) stay. However, only 19 % of surviving patients who were functionally dependent retrospectively agreed to neurocritical care. Unfavorable functional outcome and the diagnosis of stroke were independent predictors for missing retrospective consent.
Conclusions:
Retrospective agreement to neurocritical care is influenced by functional outcome. Especially in severely affected stroke patients who cannot communicate their preferences regarding life-sustaining therapy, neurocritical care physicians should balance the expected burdens and benefits of treatment to meet the patients' putative wishes. Efforts should be undertaken to identify predictors for severe disability after neurocritical care.
Thursday, 29 July 2010 19:00
Introduction:There are only limited data on consent and satisfaction of patients receiving specialized neurocritical care. In this study we (i) analyzed the extent of retrospective consent to neurocritical care - given by patients or their relatives - depending on functional outcome one year after hospital stay, and (ii) identified predisposing factors for retrospective agreement to neurocritical care.
Methods:
We investigated 704 consecutive patients admitted to a non-surgical neurocritical care unit over a period of two years (2006 to 2007). Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed and the patients were grouped according to their diagnosis. Functional outcome, retrospective consent to neurocritical care and satisfaction with hospital stay was obtained by mailed standardized questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were calculated to determine independent predictors for consent.
Results:
High consent and satisfaction after neurointensive care (91% and 90% respectively) was observed by those patients who reached an independent life one year after neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) stay. However, only 19 % of surviving patients who were functionally dependent retrospectively agreed to neurocritical care. Unfavorable functional outcome and the diagnosis of stroke were independent predictors for missing retrospective consent.
Conclusions:
Retrospective agreement to neurocritical care is influenced by functional outcome. Especially in severely affected stroke patients who cannot communicate their preferences regarding life-sustaining therapy, neurocritical care physicians should balance the expected burdens and benefits of treatment to meet the patients' putative wishes. Efforts should be undertaken to identify predictors for severe disability after neurocritical care.
Authors: Ines Kiphuth
Read More: Critical Care - Latest Articles
You need to login or register to post comments.
E - CC WORK PROGRAMME 10-11
ARFSeminarflyer